In evaluating media coverage of an issue, advocates should avoid asking which of the following questions?

When evaluating media coverage of an issue, advocates focus on understanding how the media presents information and its implications, rather than directly assessing the public's reaction to that coverage. While analyzing public response can be valuable, it does not directly pertain to the evaluation of media framing, which involves examining how issues are depicted, the language used, and the narratives crafted by journalists.

By asking about different ways the media framed an issue, the underlying assumptions behind those framings, and the facts that were emphasized or excluded, advocates can discern bias, identify important narratives, and better understand the potential impact of media on public perception. Each of these questions provides insight into the media's role in shaping discourse and informing the public, which is crucial for effective advocacy.

Ultimately, focusing on the media's framing choices allows advocates to critically engage with the content and explore how it influences societal understanding, rather than simply measuring the public’s response, which may not provide as direct an insight into the media's role in shaping the issue at hand.